.png)
MMM vs. MTA in 2025: A Lightweight MMM You Can Run in 2 Weeks
- Ahlan Emirate
- Sep 18, 2025
- 4 min read
Executive summary
Multi-touch attribution (MTA) struggles in a privacy-first world: incomplete user paths, cross-device gaps, and paid walled gardens. Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) looks at aggregated data over time and stays useful even when user-level tracking breaks. The blocker has been complexity—not usefulness.
This guide shows a lightweight MMM you can stand up in two weeks with the template above. You’ll define inputs, transform media with adstock (carryover) and saturation (diminishing returns), fit a simple regression, validate it with a small holdout, and brief Finance with clear assumptions.
MMM vs. MTA (plain English)
MTA | MMM | |
Data | User-level touchpoints | Aggregated time series (daily/weekly) |
Strength | Journey insights, near-real-time | Works despite tracking gaps; good for budget allocation |
Weakness | Missing data, platform bias | Needs careful controls; coarser granularity |
When to use | Funnel UX, creative sequencing | Budget setting, channel contribution, geo pilots |
Bottom line: If you need to set budgets or prove lift, run MMM. Keep MTA for micro UX and creative iteration.
What “lightweight” MMM includes (and excludes)
✅ Includes: 3–6 channels, daily data, simple adstock + saturation, linear regression (or ridge), small validation, weekly refresh.
🚫 Excludes: 20+ channels, hierarchical priors, Bayesian MCMC, media-mix optimizers with constraints (you can evolve into these later).
The 2-week plan (day-by-day)
Week 1 — Inputs, data, and first fit
Day 1 — Define the outcome & scope (1 hour)Choose one outcome (e.g., qualified leads or revenue). Lock the date range (≥ 12 weeks), and list your channels (e.g., Search, Social, Display). Add obvious controls: promo days, holidays, major outages.
Day 2 — Assemble daily data (2–4 hours)Fill the template’s Data sheet with:
Date; daily spend per channel
Outcome (conversions or revenue)
Controls: Promo_Flag, Holiday_Flag (0/1)
Days 3–4 — Transform media (adstock + saturation)
Adstock: models carryover → Adstock_t = Spend_t + λ * Adstock_{t-1}. Typical λ: 0.3–0.7 (faster vs slower carryover).
Saturation: models diminishing returns → Sat = 1 - exp(-β * Adstock). Typical β: 0.005–0.03 (flatter vs steeper).Use the Inputs sheet to start with λ/β guesses; adjust after validation.
Day 5 — Fit a simple modelRegress Outcome ~ Sat(Search) + Sat(Social) + Sat(Display) + Controls + Intercept.In the template’s Model sheet, the LINEST formula estimates coefficients automatically. (Google Sheets/Excel both support it.)
Day 6 — First readoutCheck directionality (all media coefficients should be ≥ 0), size (does contribution seem plausible?), and simple fit metrics (MAPE in Validation).
Week 2 — Validate, refine, and brief
Day 7 — Holdout validationKeep the last 14 days as a holdout. Compare predicted vs actual (MAPE). Expect it to be imperfect—this is directional.
Day 8 — Sensitivity checks
Try ±0.1 changes to λ per channel.
Try slightly steeper/shallower β.
Re-fit; you want stable conclusions (rank order and rough ROAS shouldn’t swing wildly).
Day 9 — Contribution & ROAS tableBuild a small table: spend, contribution (coef × Sat sum), ROAS = contrib/spend, mROAS near current spend (slope at today’s level). Use these to inform budget shifts.
Day 10 — “What-if” scenariosDuplicate your data and increase a channel’s daily spend by +10% in a test block; run through adstock+saturation to see predicted lift. This is not “exact,” but it’s comparably fair across channels.
Day 11 — Finance brief (1 page)Explain assumptions, uncertainty, and decisions this model is safe to inform. (Template below.)
Day 12–14 — Ship and schedule refreshFreeze assumptions, publish a 2-page deck, and set a monthly rerun cadence.
How to brief Finance (steal this)
Purpose. Directional budget allocation under privacy constraints—not a forensic truth of causal impact.Data. Daily spend by channel, conversions (or revenue), controls (promo/holiday).Method. Adstock (carryover), saturation (diminishing returns), linear regression with a 14-day holdout.Quality checks. Face validity (signs), stability under λ/β tweaks, holdout MAPE, and contribution sanity vs historicals.Decisions supported. Rebalancing budget across channels (±10–30%), testing geo pilots, forecasting under 2–3 scenarios.Decisions not supported. Creative judgments, path-level insights, hard contract guarantees.Next steps. Run a 4-week geo holdout to measure incremental lift for any big budget change suggested by MMM.
What’s inside the template (and how it works)
README. 10-step setup.
Inputs. λ (adstock) and β (saturation) per channel; editable.
Data. Paste daily spend/outcome; optional controls.
Adstock. Pre-built formulas compute carryover.
Saturation. Pre-built 1 - EXP(-β*Adstock) curves.
Model. LINEST returns coefficients + intercept; Predicted column computes model fit.
Validation. Last 14 days as holdout; MAPE auto-calculates.
Results. Quick ROAS and contribution table.
👉 Download the template: WhiteWolf_MMM_Template.xlsx(Open in Excel or import to Google Sheets; formulas are compatible.)
Interpreting results (so you don’t over-claim)
Coefficient ≠ ROI. It’s the slope of the saturated response—use the Results sheet to convert to contribution and ROAS.
mROAS matters. Marginal ROAS (near your current spend) tells you where the next dollar works hardest.
Collinearity happens. If two channels always move together, one may pick up more credit. Use geo tests to separate them.
Seasonality & promos. If you don’t control for them, media can “explain” seasonality—add flags or a simple weekly seasonality control.
Common pitfalls (and simple fixes)
Using clicks as outcome. Choose qualified leads, sales, or revenue—business outcomes.
Too many knobs. Start with 3–6 channels. You can add more after the first readout.
No holdout. Always keep a small slice to test out-of-sample.
Publishing too early. Run sensitivity checks before you present to leadership.
Save-worthy checklist
One outcome selected (leads/sales/revenue)
12+ weeks of daily data loaded
λ/β set per channel (documented)
Coefficients positive & plausible
Holdout MAPE recorded
Contribution + (m)ROAS table built
Next test: geo holdout for any large budget moves
FAQ (quick)
Can I add TV/OOH? Yes—aggregate daily or weekly GRPs/spend and include them like any channel (may need slower λ).What about brand search bleed? Keep brand search separate from non-brand; treat it like a response channel (often faster λ, higher β).Bayesian or ridge? If coefficients are jumpy, try ridge (regularization) or a simple Bayesian prior. Start simple; justify complexity later.
Comments